IPv6 News

All News about IPv6

IPv6 News header image 4

Entries from February 2011

Caidagram: Visualising Geographically Annotated Internet Measurements

February 28th, 2011 · Comments Off

With measurement networks rapidly evolving up to hundreds of nodes (see RIPE Atlas as a prominent recent example), it becomes more and more challenging to extract useful visualisations from tons of collected data. At the same time, geographical information related to Internet measurements (either known or inferred with state-of-the-art techniques) can be exploited to build tools based on geography as a common knowledge base.

We wanted to develop a tool to visualise different classes of geographically annotated Internet data, e.g., topology, address allocation, DNS and economical data. In cooperation with The Cooperative Association of for Internet Data Analysis CAIDA, we developed a new interactive tool — Caidagram — derived from a decades-old visualisation technique called a cartogram. A cartogram is a map whose geometry is distorted to convey new information. A classic example depicts the United States with geographic distance distorted as a function of the population, coloured by the results of the 2004 presidential elections.

Each Caidagram extends the geographic mapping metaphor to other variables, while attempting to maximise intuitiveness and readability. We used Caidagrams to create interactive animations illustrating data trends over time. We show two examples of how a Caidagram can provide insight into real Internet data.

Methodology and Results

In the first example, we look at round trip times (RTT) between different end points, including one-to-many scenarios where we depict RTTs from different locations to one single endpoint. The common endpoint is normally placed in the centre of concentric circles that represent increasing distances.

In our example, the centre represents K-root (including all anycast instances) and the concentric circles represent RTT values. Countries are placed within the concentric circle that corresponds with the average RTT value of that country. This value was determined by combining the RTT values of all test traffic measurement boxes in that country as measured with the RIPE NCC DNS Monitoring service DNSMON. The Test Traffic Measurements network TTM is a network of measurement devices deployed by the RIPE NCC in various locations all over the world.

In Figure 1, you can see a frame from an animation showing round trip times to the K root server. The countries circling around the center, are those in which we placed more than one RIPE NCC TTM monitoring box: USA, The Netherlands, Italy, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, UK, Germany, Luxembourg, Estonia, Portugal, Austria, Sweden, Czech Republic, Israel, Cyprus. To increase readability, countries on the same continent are shown in the same colour.

In order to keep latency to a minimum, there are K-root instances on most continents and often more than one. However, sometimes a TTM box queries a root server instance that is on a different continent. This will increase the RTT value and places the country further away from the centre of the image as is the case for the US and Australia in our example.

Figure 1: Caidagram showing RTT values to K-root using DNSMON (Click to Enlarge)

The second example uses a more traditional cartogram technique to compare quantitative per-country Internet statistics, such as the number of Internet addressing resources in a country. The image below distorts the shape of each country, by either inflating or deflating its boundaries, depending on the number of Autonomous Systems (ASes) assigned to organisations in that country. At the same time, the colour indicates what percentage of these ASes are IPv6 enabled which means, the AS announces one or more IPv6 prefixes (red means no IPv6 enabled ASes and green means all ASes are IPv6 enabled).

The US is very inflated because of the many AS numbers assigned. However, you can also see that only around 10% of these ASes are IPv6 enabled. On the other hand, some European countries, most visibly The Netherlands, are shown in light green, which means almost 50% of the ASes are IPv6 enabled. South America and Africa are very small in this image, because not many AS numbers are assigned in these regions. The underlying data for this image is taken from v6asns.ripe.net (see also Networks with IPv6 over Time)

Figure 2: Caidagram showing IPv6 enabled ASes (Click to Enlarge)

Claudio Squarcella presented Caidagram at RIPE 61 in Rome. The tool is implemented with AJAX for compatibility with most modern web browsers, and uses the Google Web Toolkit and Raphaël, a Javascript library for vector graphics. You can also view a demo version of the tool or look at the source code. Please also see the article contributed by Claudio Squarcella on RIPE Labs ‘Caidagram :Visualising Geographically Annotated Internet Measurements‘.

Try Caidagram now!

(Please note that this is work in progress and will be improved over time.)

Written by Mirjam Kuehne

[Read more →]

Tags: CircleID · IPv6 · internet

A Politically Incorrect Guide to IPv6

February 28th, 2011 · Comments Off

Every packet of data sent over the Internet is sent from one IP address to another. The IP addresses in the Internet serve somewhat the same function as phone numbers in the US phone system, fixed length numeric identifiers where the first part tells what network the address is on. Since the dawn of the Internet in the early 1980s, the IP addresses in use have been IPv4, 32 bit addresses which means there are about 4 billion of them. Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve doubtless seen reports that the supply of IPv4 addresses is running out. Earlier this month IANA, the master allocation authority, handed out the last so-called /8, a large chunk of 16 million addresses, to one of the regional address registries, and sometime months or perhaps a few years after that, the registries will hand out the last pieces of their chunks. Then what?

The conventional wisdom is that everyone needs to support IPv6, a mostly compatible upgrade to IPv4 with much larger addresses, by the time the v4 space runs out. But I’m not so sure, particularly for e-mail.

There’s two unanswered questions here. One is is how hard it will be for new or expanding networks to get IPv4 address space. The other is how important IPv6 addresses will be to be able to reach the rest of the net. The conventional answers are very hard and very important, but I think the real answers to both, for the next several years, at least, is not very. Below is my three-part post where I opine about getting IPv4 address space, addressing and reachability.

A politically incorrect guide to IPv6, Part I

A politically incorrect guide to IPv6, Part II

A politically incorrect guide to IPv6, Part III

Written by John Levine, Author, Consultant & Speaker

[Read more →]

Tags: CircleID · IPv6 · internet

Prepare business for IPv6

February 28th, 2011 · Comments Off

We need to move up to Version 6 (IPv6) because, although the earlier version gave us 4.3 billion address combinations, we’re rapidly running out of them. You can see why. The Net’s early designers didn’t foresee a world where smart phones were connecting to the Web, and billions of new devices from TV tuners to [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: IPv6

Canadian Internet providers face looming glitches because of space shortage

February 28th, 2011 · Comments Off

Swelling numbers of iPads, e-readers and laptops are swallowing up the finite space on the Internet and raising fears of the types of slowdowns and glitches predicted with the Y2K bug.
Complete info at Winnipeg Free Press, TheStar and thespec.

[Read more →]

Tags: IPv6 · IPv6 Task Force

Will cloud plug gap between IPv4 and IPv6?

February 27th, 2011 · Comments Off

The impact of the dwindling supply of IPv4 addresses will depend on how long it takes to deploy IPv6 fully. It is in that interim period that we’ll see whether cloud computing can really fulfil its promise of shared resources, says Lori MacVittie.
Complete info at ZDNet.

[Read more →]

Tags: IPv6 · IPv6 Task Force

The future of the internet revealed

February 27th, 2011 · Comments Off

In Depth: What the internet might look like in 2020.
Complete info at TechRadar.

[Read more →]

Tags: IPv6 · IPv6 Task Force

IPv6: Four Steps to Take Now

February 27th, 2011 · Comments Off

If you don’t act to add IPv6 to your network, you’re not only limiting the growth of your business, you may be turning away thousands of customers.
Complete info at InformationWeek.

[Read more →]

Tags: IPv6 · IPv6 Task Force

Picks to Play Cable Trends

February 27th, 2011 · Comments Off

NetLogic and Entropic both could see a boost from new technology.
Complete info at Barron’s.

[Read more →]

Tags: IPv6 · IPv6 Task Force

IPv6’s next transition challenge: The broadband home network

February 27th, 2011 · Comments Off

While there’s clearly a call to action for service providers, web application providers and even businesses to make sure they have an IPv6 transition in place, the other true test of how much impact IPv6 will have on the state of the Internet will be at the consumer level.
Complete info at FierceTelecom.

[Read more →]

Tags: IPv6 · IPv6 Task Force

Q&A: Vinton Cerf on the Internet’s Future

February 27th, 2011 · Comments Off

Vinton Cerf is widely recognized as one of the founding fathers of the Internet and currently holds the title of “chief Internet evangelist” at search giant Google Inc.
Complete info at The Wall Street Journal.

[Read more →]

Tags: IPv6 · IPv6 Task Force